How's Your Soul?

Posted by Alex | | 1 comments »

A thoughtful article from Church Warnock. Is the church a place where we just teach people what to believe? Or is somewhere we care for the state of a person's soul?

"What was lost in the 20th century was an emphasis on the condition of one’s soul, because that was displaced by the condition of one’s mind — what do you believe?

But if we return to asking the question, How is it with your soul?, we would accomplish several things."


In 2003 I was privileged to visit and study a number of churches in northern California that had experienced dramatic turn-around, or revival if you prefer. One of those was New Vintage Church in Sonoma, led by Andy VomSteeg. In 1980 there were 593 people in Sonoma county who identified with the American Baptist Church, the denomination with whom New Vintage identifies. By 2000 this number had declined to just 145. New Vintage Church had once been one of the largest Protestant churches in the county with a history dating back to 1868. By 1998 membership had shrunk to just 78, most of them elderly worshippers. That's when Andy took up the pastorate there and set about leading this church into a new season of relevance, growth and community impact. It was not without it's pain, however, and significant pain I should add. The process has born much fruit and late last year New Vintage Church moved out of their 380 seat auditorium into a local 1600 seat Arts Centre, they now have 1000 in regular Sunday attendance. The story is inspiring and it demonstrates that there is hope for a dying church if pastors are willing to lead and pay a hefty price. Read about it [HERE], and share it with those who need a new vision. The article contains the story of transformation along with testimonies of those who have come to faith at New Vintage and some detail on how the church is building bridges to impact their community.

Some favorite quotes ...

  • Church starts Sunday morning with rock music loud enough to rival Van Halen
  • A Christian congregation that markets itself as “the church for people who don't like church.”
  • In 2002, he took out the wooden pews at First Baptist with a chainsaw
  • He smashed the old church organ with a sledge hammer, brought in a rock band and installed video screens.
  • [New Vintage] communicates who we are,” VomSteeg said. “God wants you to have a quality life.”
  • A Rohnert Park man who is also in recovery from addiction said the church is a haven. “It's just easy to come here,” he said. 
  • "Our level of spirituality is measured by how well we love one another.”

Late last year we ran an evening dinner event to which our church invited their friends, they always do a great job of that. However, wanting to cast the net a little wider, we looked at advertising. The budget was tight (as usual), so we thought we'd try something new and place an inexpensive banner ad on Facebook. It was an experiment. In the end the ad was viewed 37, 623 times over three weeks and we did have some folks there that were not directly invited by our people, though it's hard to tell how they heard about the event. In my book the experiment was a moderate success and I suspect we will invest in Facebook ads again in the future. Here's the story of one church who had great success with Facebook ads. Have you used them? Would you in the future?

Thank you to Mark Wilson from Revitalize Your Church blog for drawing our attention to this gem ...

Renowned atheist, Christopher Hitchens, was interviewed recently by Unitarian Minister, Marilyn Sewell in Portland Monthly.
Hitchens, author of God is Not Great, holds perspectives and opinions that are quite contrary to those shared by Bible believing Christians.

However, in this interview, there was one little part where Mr. Hitchens was spot on!

Sewell: The religion you cite in your book is generally the fundamentalist faith of various kinds. I’m a liberal Christian, and I don’t take the stories from the scripture literally. I don’t believe in the doctrine of atonement (that Jesus died for our sins, for example). Do you make any distinction between fundamentalist faith and liberal religion?

Hitchens: I would say that if you don’t believe that Jesus of Nazareth was the Christ and Messiah, and that he rose again from the dead and by his sacrifice our sins are forgiven, you’re really not in any meaningful sense a Christian.
Sewell: Let's go someplace else. . .

Amen, Mr. Hitchens!

Inglewood Church Web Presence

Posted by Mark Edwards | | 0 comments »

This is a video I made up for a friend doing some teaching on using the web for church.

"We are drifting back into paganism, that’s the truth," he said in a lecture last Saturday at St Matthew’s Cathedral in Dallas .... [More]


I've been following a story in the Straits Times about the desire of some Christians in Asia to use the name Allah when referring to God. It has not been a popular request and now protesters are burning churches to vent their displeasure [Story]. I certainly don't understand all the reasons why Christians feel it necessary to use the name Allah instead of God, but when churches start to burn over the issue and when lives are put at risk I have to ask if it really is necessary. Are we really willing to be martyred over semantics? What do you think?

A widespread abandonment of Christian doctrinal commitment — even doctrinal knowledge. Forget the rising number of people with no religious identity; the news to me is the vast number of self-identified Christians who have no real knowledge of, or deep commitment to, a specific Christian faith. You could say they were watering down Christianity’s teachings, but I question if they even know those core teachings.

Cathy Lynn Grossman, religion reporter, USA TODAY on the most significant change in Christianity in the past decade. HT to Todd Rhoades
  
  

On my growing list of "must do's", is "Attend the Catalyst Conference." With that little bit in mind, I was very excited to see the first volume of the Catalyst Groupzine in Koorong for a ridiculous $21. I would like to encourage you to grab a copy of this fantastic resource. Pour over it and then sit down with some mates and dive in with the questions. If anyone is interested in being part of some discussions about stuff in the mag, let us know!

http://orders.koorong.com/search/details.jhtml?code=1418503258&printable=true

Check it out, best $21 you'll spend I reckon!

Every blessing and all the best for Christmas and 2010!

A new unauthorised biography of “America’s pastor” Rick Warren uncovers a marriage with an unconventional beginning and a time of depression that later gave Warren the strength to become who he is today. [Full Article]

To be ‘in the world’ but not ‘of the world’ is a well-known phrase drawn from the final discourse of Jesus in John 17. It captures most fittingly the tension that Christians experience between the call to discipleship and the norms and pressures of the day-to-day world in which that discipleship must be lived out.

Seeking to be ‘in sync’ with the ‘not of the world’ call of Jesus, Evangelicals of an era not-too-long ago were especially concerned with certain activities which were considered to betray ‘personal holiness’ such as smoking, drinking any alcohol, dancing, watching particular kinds of movies—or any movies—and, of course, sexual promiscuity. These prohibited activities ranged from those clearly proscribed by the Bible to those that to fellow Evangelicals seemed rather arbitrary. Be that as it may, the thing which linked all these was the concern with personal morality.

Those activities which were more controversial in their prohibition carried an air of being ‘out of the world’. Interestingly, when many Evangelicals ‘rediscovered’ that public life was a worthwhile site of engagement, their new enthusiasm for being ‘in the world’ was often not matched with the scruples concerning its ‘worldly’ character that they had displayed concerning personal holiness. Involvement of Christians in politics was, on a very important level, indistinguishable from the involvement of others.

Sure enough, Christians often represented stances on particular issues—notably on sexuality and bioethical issues—that were distinct in that they were out-of-step with where many in wider society were going. On the other hand, on some matters where, given a close reading of the Gospels, one might have expected a distinctive Christian voice, there was little to be heard. Is it any surprise that those matters were the exercise of power and questions of violence? After all, what is wrong with a bit of political headkicking when I can get a bill through to further ‘Christian interests’…? Hmmm…

There is no question that Christians have a part to play—actually, a range of parts—in public life. But do we naïvely assume that grasping the reigns of power or voting in our preferred candidate is the ultimate political aspiration?

If we were to remove politics from the Bible, it would be a holey Bible indeed. The story of Israel and its covenant relationship with our Creator is nothing if not political. It is to that story we are often drawn (occasionally forgetting the Messiah may have something distinctive to say about ‘politics’). And furthermore, despite the warnings of God through the prophet Samuel, we are frequently attracted to the power politics of the monarchy for our political model. Yet the ‘height’ of Israel under Solomon, the son of David, is full of corruption and the ‘rot’ has set in. This is a story which is told from the point of view of exile. Power politics and the quest for military might is not a ‘success story’.

Neither is a story with which we may be more familiar, the rise and fading of Christendom. Along with many positive influences which came out of the infusing of the Bible in Western culture were many distortions of the gospel of Jesus Christ, particularly in relation to power, coercion and violence in order to further ‘Christian’ ends. No longer representing culture as a whole, no longer at the centre of power, Christians can rightly learn from the Jewish experience of Exile and Diaspora.

The prophet Jeremiah sent word to leaders, elders, prophets and priests, and all the people of God in exile to “build houses”, “plant gardens”, marry and multiply. As they did so, they were further told by God, “Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare” (Jeremiah 29:1-7). ‘Welfare’ is shalom: peace, harmony, prosperity with justice. Exile is transformed by grace from a place of despair to a new site and base for mission. Indeed the New Testament celebrates both our ‘return from Exile’ in terms of our reconciliation to and participation in the promised kingdom of God and also our continuance in an ‘Exilic’ mode of existence and mission.

We can expect too much from the ‘seat of power’ and in doing so expect too little of ourselves until some hoped-for ‘day of power’ returns. What if that is not what we are to be hoping for? What if in fact the politics of exile, of being trained as an exemplary minority with an alternative politics of genuine servanthood (and not trendy ‘servant leadership’), is the order of the day? What if Christian community is meant to be a genuine witness to God’s purpose for the world? What if Christians scattered in workplaces and households and neighbourhoods, living our their vocation of discipleship critically and constructively through their roles are the real hope of politics.

Herbert McCabe once said, “The relevance of Christianity to human behaviour is primarily a matter of politics…” I think he could well be right. But what kind of politics? Thinking beyond ‘party politics’ or ‘power politics’, might our primary political focus include the following:

1. Christians as a gathered community—a city on a hill, a light to the world—must inculcate a culture among themselves particularly committed to the transforming initiatives of the Sermon on the Mount and “teaching everything [Jesus has] commanded” (see Matthew 28:18-20)

2. Christians need to be involved in forming or perpetuating non-government social movements and ‘ministries’ dedicated to implementing restorative justice practices.

3. Christians in their various social roles should look for opportunities to contribute to the transformation of their institutions through analysis, critique, imagination, example and advocacy.

There are inevitable tensions between citizenship and discipleship yet discipleship is a non-negotiable calling. Civic responsibility does not trump Christian faithfulness. Yet, as a Christian ‘social philosophy’, citizenship should be recognised as a relative good which may be able to further the cause of Christ-inspired restorative justice.

Be ‘in the world’ but ‘not of the world’.


From Engage Mail 09-11 (November 2009) Contact me to subscribe